Digital photography lends itself to many photos. The result—thousands of photos—requires management. This method follows the best English grading method I’ve encountered; my other English teachers lacked this rigor, which resulted in grading misunderstandings (and, perhaps, more interest in my part for the sciences). The following four categories should be weighted equally.
- Mechanics - Correct focus? Correct contrast? Appropriate sharpness?
- Organization - Good framing? Are elements plumb with the frame? Any distractions? Do the elements follow the rule of thirds or some other guiding principal? Could cropping rescue something?
- Ideas - Is the photo interesting? Is it a good reference or stock photo? Does it tell a story? What is the subject?
- Style - How well are the ideas expressed? Do the colors work? This also encompasses the “gut” feeling of the photo.
The rules should complement one another: if the photo is otherwise perfect, but the focus does not agree with the subject, the photo probably should be rejected. If the rules all agree, the photo should have the initial “wow!” and stand up to systemic review.
When comparing multiple photos, ask “is there a better picture?” or “did I capture the subject (or event, or location) properly over the photo set?” This can be used to weed out rejects, or to better prepare one for the next shoot: what did you miss? If you could go back, what would you do differently? Select photos that illustrate various faults: missed focus, framing mistakes, poor subject choice. Otherwise, toss!
Use tags or sort images for future action. For example, tag images as croppable?, then review these in the future. An otherwise bad photo may be salvageable for some other purpose: goose feather pattern close-up, and the like. I also take sample shots, varying the f-number versus the exposure time, or trying different white balance options, and so on. These sets can then be studied to better memorize the effects of higher versus lower f-number†, and to learn how a camera or lens behaves under known conditions.
Try to find a local photo club, or someone willing to review photos. These can be very educational, as others will have different insight into the same photo, which in turn will improve your photo rating skills.
Recently imported my photos into Aperture, which allows me to shoot only raw, easily organize photos, perform simple corrections, and upload to Flickr. Did not have to read the Aperture manual, which is a plus. I’m avoiding extensive photo reworking, as I want to focus on learning the camera and taking better pictures, not mutating photos beyond all recognition. For now.
† Some conditions reverse expectations. On a bridge where death rollers vibrate the camera, longer exposures will result in softer images, not sharper pictures as expected.